Talking Letters with Josh Knelman
The Modern Letter Project talks to Josh Knelman, co-editor of Four Letter Word: Invented Correspondence from the Edge of Modern Romance, about love letters, Leonard Cohen, and the future of letter-writing.

MLP: Hi Josh. Please introduce yourself!
Josh: Hi there. I’m a Toronto-based writer and editor and Four Letter Word is my first edited collection, so I’m a little nervous of course.
I’m spending the next year writing a non-fiction investigative book about international art theft—people who steal paintings, and people who search for paintings that have been stolen. In a way, it’s also a book about love lost and love found. I’ve met a lot of people who have fallen in love with a particular work of art. I guess in one sense, the book is a long and complicated love letter, to all the artwork that has been stolen from our collective culture. It’s called Hot Art.
MLP: Tell us how you and your co-editor Rosalind Porter came up with the idea for this collection, Four Letter Word.
Josh: I have trouble sleeping sometimes. When I do, I often reach for a book I’ve enjoyed--a familiar voice. Three years ago at three in the morning I reread a few pages from Leonard Cohen’s Stranger Music, a collection of his poetry and writing. I came across a letter he’d written that was essentially a love letter; the next morning it was still floating in my mind. At the time, I was fiction editor at The Walrus magazine (in Canada) and I wanted to do something special for the annual Summer Fiction Issue. I thought it would be great find some of my favorite writers and ask them to submit old love letters.

I realized that most of the writers I would want to ask were fiction writers. Initially, I’d thought I would be looking for real love letters--but why? What if I asked the best fiction writers in Canada to pen fictional love letters? I asked Margaret Atwood first. I was lucky; she said yes. Her support set the stage to commission the original series of eight letters including Douglas Coupland, David Bezmozgis, and a love poem from Leonard Cohen. The series took more then six months to coordinate. It was an experiment in fiction, and there were no rules.
Each letter that was delivered was a surprise in terms of story and character. They were unexpected, and intimate, just like real love letters. I sent a copy of the series to my friend Rosalind Porter, who worked at Random House, UK, who wrote an incredible proposal that was accepted by Poppy Hampson, an editor at Chatto and Windus (thank you Poppy). Suddenly we were experimenting on a much grander scale, asking writers from across the world to pen fictional love letters.
MLP: This collection features work from a wide range of authors and artists—Jonathan Lethem to Margaret Atwood to Leonard Cohen. How did you choose whom to include?
Josh: Ros and I approached writers we loved. It was a long process, full of surprises and, yes, rejection. Essentially, we spent over a year and half writing love letters to our favorite writers asking them to pen fictional love letters for the collection. It was a dream job.
MLP: In the title you coin use the phrase, “four letter word.” Why not explicitly use—but imply--the word “love?”
Josh: The unifying theme of the collection is love and letters, although love comes in so many forms, and can feed off so many other emotions: fear, lust, hate, loss, hope… these are all four letter words that are drawn from in these love letters. And love isn’t always what you expect. Certainly, it’s so much more complicated then a Hallmark card and yes, sometimes, love is expressed in less eloquent language and vocabulary. And sometimes it all just comes out wrong in a letter. F*CK.
MLP: What were the criteria for each writers' contributions?
Josh: We asked each writer to pen a fictional letter love letter, between 1000-2500 words. Those were the only rules of the game. We wanted writers to use their expansive imaginations unhindered. There was always a sense of mystery to each new love letter.
MLP: What do you think comprises a modern day letter?
Josh: There are so many forms. I’ve received long text messages that I would count as letters. In fact, in Japan, there are now entire novels that are beamed out in chapters of text. I also think a well crafted email counts as a letter. Of course, nothing is as intimate as a hand written letter, delivered by mail or, even better, by hand. For me, a letter is all about the amount of time and thought that the letter-writer invests.
MLP: Do you think it’s important to preserve the art/craft/practice of letter writing?
Josh: Yes, of course. And I think as long as anyone exists who feels the desire to communicate in a profound way with another human being, the art of letter writing will never vanish. I have to admit it’s been a long time since I’ve received a letter in the mail. Mostly, I get bills—the opposite of love letters.
MLP: The jacket of your book refers to the love letter as a “forgotten custom.” Why do you think it is being forgotten?
Josh: I think sometimes it’s easier to send a quick text message or a fast email. Writing a letter is often about remembering. I don’t exactly think that it’s a forgotten custom, but I do believe we could all spend a little more time remembering, and writing to someone we love.
MLP: We found the piece by Joseph Boyden—a series of missing persons reports filed by a husband about his wife in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina—to be especially moving. Were there pieces you found especially affective?
Josh: I was also especially moved by Joseph’s love letter. It’s a brave experiment that worked, and it builds to heartbreak. What I found surprising about the collection, when Ros and I had received all of the letters, was that without exception, every single letter was so different. One of our fears was that we would receive a lot of letters that were similar, but often these love letters are effective because they have created their own rules.
Jeanette Winterson’s love letter centers around the idea of photographs, and is effective because the writer tells us all about the little intimate details and feelings that would be impossible to discern from looking at a photograph. David Bezmozgis, on the other hand, allows us to read a very intimate letter from a Russian revolutionary who is about to be executed. Only at the end of the letter do we realize it was never delivered. Bezmozgis creates a found, historical document. What is still amazing to me is that each letter succeeds at being effective on its own terms.
MLP: Where do you see the state of the handwritten letter in 10 years? 20? 50?
Josh: As long as people struggle to find a way of expressing the strangest, funniest, and deepest parts of themselves to others, letters, I think, will essentially remain the same. Or, maybe we’ll have a total evolutionary leap and be able to communicate telepathically. If this happens, letters might be in trouble. I don’t like predicting the
future. I’m so bad at it.
MLP: Are you a letter-writer?
Josh: Apologies, but I don’t write and tell. After all, love letters are private, and often, secret.
MLP: Anything else?
Josh: I hope anyone who reads this Q&A sends one love letter to someone who
would be happier for receiving one.
Four Letter Word: Invented Romance from the Edge of Modern Romance just hit bookstores and is also available for purchase HERE. Josh, the book, and some of its authors will also be reading selections from the book at a launch party at Barnes & Noble, Tribeca (97 Warren Street @ Greenwich), on February 11th at 7 p.m.










